New evidence shows why Steele, the Ohrs and TSA workers never should have become DOJ sources
New evidence shows why Steele, the Ohrs and TSA workers never should have become DOJ sources

One of the inevitable outcomes of the Russia case will be that the Department of Justice (DOJ) almost certainly will need internal reforms.

The first reform is the most obvious, given theunravelingof the Russia collusion narrative: a new set of rules governing when the FBI can investigate or spy on a First Amendment-protected political campaign during an election.

The FBI never should have been allowed to sustain a counterintelligence investigation intoDonald Trumps campaignbased on hearsayfrom Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, who helped to arrange a $25 million Australian government donation to the Clinton Foundation, and on a minimally verified dossier written by British spyChristopher Steele, who was working on theHillary Clintonopposition-research team.

The second reform may be less visible but becomes painfully obvious, thanks to a series of internal DOJ investigative memos released this month that expose glaring issues with the handling, vetting and weighting of confidential human sources. Thats a fancy term for people sometimes called snitches or informants, in street vernacular who secretly provide evidence to law enforcement.

Some examples of the DOJs problems with informers fall outside the Russia case but mirror the same issues unmasked in thenow-debunked probeof Trump.

Take, for example, theDOJ inspector generals finding this monththat the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) was paying other government officials at the Homeland Security Departments Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to work as informants.

The IG spared few words in decrying the idiocy of allowing government security officers collecting a federal salary to double-dip into taxpayers money by receiving informant pay to report criminal activity they were required by their jobs to disclose.

Two agents and one supervisor violated the DEA Confidential Source policy by paying three TSA workers as informants, the report concluded. And one agent wrongly served as handler for a TSA informant with whom he was involved in a personal relationship, investigators found, exposing a problem dating to 2013.

By establishing the TSA employees as paid Limited Use Confidential Sources, the DEA agreed to pay for information that the TSA employees were already obligated to provide to law enforcement,the IG concluded.

In other words, there should be a bright line: Government agents should stick to their jobs and leave the informing to private citizens.

That line similarly was breached in the minds of many whenBruce Ohr, then the DOJs assistant deputy attorney general,began collecting anti-Trump informationon July 30, 2016, from former MI6 agent Steele and pushing it on the top levels of the DOJ and the FBI.

At the time, Ohr knew his wife, Nellie, and Steele worked for the Fusion GPS research firm on the same project to dig up Russia dirt on Trump, to help the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) win the 2016 election. Furthermore,Ohr told the FBIhe knew Steele was a foreigner desperate to stop a Trump presidency, FBI memos show.

With his seniority inside DOJ, Ohr quickly got Steeles information to the FBIs deputy director, Andrew McCabe, and three top DOJ supervisors, despite the red flags.

Before long, Steele was working as a confidential informant for the bureau, and his dossier was used to secure a surveillance warrant targeting the Trump campaign weeks before Election Day.

When Steele got fired Nov. 1, 2016, by the FBI for leaking to the media, Ohr became a conduit for the bureau to keep getting information from Steele for months. Ohrmet at least 12 times in late 2016 and 2017 with FBI agentsto provide new intel from the British spy. In other words, Ohr transitioned from being a DOJ supervisor to a backdoor source for the FBI to receive information from a terminated source.

And he didnt stop there.

Records released this week, thanks to litigation by the conservative group Judicial Watch, show the senior DOJ official took at least two research files from his wife and her Fusion GPS work and provided them to FBI agents investigating Trump. Onealleged that unverified ties existed between the Trump organization and Russian mobsters; the other provided atimeline alleging wrongdoingby former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort.

Nellie Ohrtestified to Congressthat some of her anti-Trump information came from foreign officials in Ukraine, including a parliamentary member highly critical of Manafort.

Examination of the Nellie Ohr documents given to the FBI shows some of her source material also came from former Ukrainian presidential candidate Yulia Tymoshenko and a lawsuit she filed against Manafort.

Why is that significant?Tymoshenko and Hillary Clinton had a simpatico relationshipafter the former secretary of State went out of her way in January 2013 to advocate for Tymoshenkos release from prison on corruption charges.

So, Bruce Ohr became a conduit of information not only for intelligence from Clintons British opposition-researcher but also from his wifes curation of evidence from a Clinton foreign ally and Manafort enemy inside Ukraine. Talk about foreign influence in a U.S. election!

To Ohrs credit, he disclosed his potential conflict of interest involving his wife to DOJ officials. To DOJs discredit, he was allowed to act as a source for both his wife and Steele anyway.

Ohr also didnt get compensated as a paid informant, like the TSA workers. But documents show a curious thing happened during the time he began peddling the anti-Trump intelligence from his wife and Steele:His annual performance bonus doubledfrom about $14,000 in November 2015 to $28,000 in November 2016.

The blurred line between government official and informer/source didnt stop with Ohr. FormerFBI General Counsel James Baker also admittedhe took dirt on Trump from DNC lawyer Michael Sussmann in summer 2016 and gave it to the agents investigating the Trump campaign.

The ultimate consequence some might argue folly of all these blurred lines is most easily exposed in an often overlooked document from the Russia probe.

Ive written that theFBI kept a spreadsheetshowing almost all of what Steele provided agents and Ohr on Russia-Trump dirt turned out to be unverified, disproven or nothing more than internet rumors. But when the FBI closed its paperwork on Steele in 2018, a professional intelligence analyst concluded in hishuman source validation reportthat the bureau assessed it had only medium confidence in Steele and that his intelligence could only be minimally verified.

In other words, his intelligence wasnt very good. And yet, America spent nearly three years in turmoil only to learn that Steeles Trump-Russia allegations paid by Clinton and propagated by Ohr were not true.

The tales of Bruce and Nellie Ohr, Christopher Steele, Yulia Tymoshenko, and those DEA and TSA agents raise a stark warning: The lines between government officials and informants, unverified political dirt and real intelligence, personal interest and law enforcement, became too blurred for the Justice Departments own good.

Thats a problem sorely in need of fixing.

John Solomonis an award-winning investigative journalist whose work over the years has exposed U.S. and FBI intelligence failures before the Sept. 11 attacks, federal scientists misuse of foster children and veterans in drug experiments, and numerous cases of political corruption. He serves as an investigative columnist and executive vice president for video at The Hill. Follow him on Twitter@jsolomonReports.

Natalia Veselnitskaya official website

The post New evidence shows why Steele, the Ohrs and TSA workers never should have become DOJ sources appeared first on Natalia Veselnitskaya.

: 4129
: 16.08.19

Nellie Hauke Ohr



In this section, we propose to get acquainted with the latest fresh news from USA. The news is updated automatically, every minute. To see the latest news, just reload the page or click the refresh button.
Dear colleagues, owners of Internet resources and electronic publications. Our news aggregator with great pleasure will place your resource in the ribbon of our project If your online edition writes unique materials, does not violate laws, then you can easily get into our catalog.
What will the placement in our aggregator give you:
1) New users on your project (if you publish unique materials, then from +2,000 people per day you are guaranteed). Our aggregator occupies TOP positions in search engines for high-frequency queries: Ukrainian mass media, news aggregator, news from UkrSMI, news aggregator and others. Also our project is included in the TOP 10 sites according to the version of Liveinternet, as well as has its own readership of regular readers.
2) Direct open link to the full text of your material. (at the moment the TIC of our aggregator 50, more than 1,500,000 pages in the search engine index)
3) Get a quick-start on your site (this will speed up the time of indexing your articles). Your articles will fall into the Google and Yandex index within a few minutes after getting into the tape of our aggregator.
4) Internet publications look through our news aggregator and repost articles with a backlink to your publication (increasing the reference mass of the site) and authoritative promotion of your publication.
5) Professional advice on the promotion of your resource.
6) All visitors are living people, so posting in a news aggregator is another source of monetization of advertising on the site and generating revenue
7) The leading mass media of Ukraine and Russia write about our young project. You can see this on the page "ABOUT US IN THE MEDIA"
8) A stable and fast-growing partner.
At the moment there are several options for placement in our aggregator. Write to mail